Two-pronged plan to attack prediabetes
Treat condition early to head off full-blown disease
By Stacey Butterfield
Fifty-seven million Americans. Three hundred fourteen million people worldwide.
By the numbers, prediabetes is clearly not an orphan disease. Yet, until recently, internists had very little guidance on how to treat patients who have the condition and reduce their risk of developing full-blown diabetes.
Earlier this year, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) issued updated recommendations on screening and prevention or delay of diabetes. Then, in July, the American College of Endocrinology (ACE) convened a consensus conference on the diagnosis and management of prediabetes.
“This was the first true scientific summit on prediabetes,” said Daniel Einhorn, MD, a member of the ACE task force on preventing diabetes. Experts from around the world gathered to apply current research to a number of prediabetes issues, including diagnostic and screening criteria, treatment goals and appropriate therapy. “What we realized is that this gap between normal and overt diabetes is not a gap that is benign,” said Dr. Einhorn.
However, given the limitations of existing research on prediabetes, even the new guidance released by the experts is uncertain, he cautioned. “It’s a consensus conference because we don’t really know for sure. There’s no consensus conference on gravity.”
Still, the experts were certain enough to make a few strong statements about appropriate treatment of prediabetes (available online). “We feel very strongly that there needs to be a two-pronged approach: one directed at glucose, one directed at cardiovascular risk,” Dr. Einhorn said.
The second prong is, in some ways, the simpler of the two. After a diagnosis of prediabetes, which the consensus defined as impaired fasting glucose (100-125 mg/dL), impaired glucose tolerance (140-199 mg/dL) or metabolic syndrome, patients should be treated to the same cardiovascular goals as actual diabetics, they said.
That means using statins to get LDL cholesterol to 100 mg/dL and non-HDL to 130 mg/dL or below, and treating blood pressure to 130/80 mm Hg or less, in addition to low-dose aspirin for anyone without excess bleeding risk. “Although data is limited, the safety and ease of therapy for blood pressure and lipids is such that being proactive is defensible,” explained the consensus report.
The recommendations are based on research, including the Framingham, DREAM and Nurses Health studies, which found significantly increased (in some cases almost double the normal) cardiovascular risk in people with prediabetes.
The endocrinology experts pointed to metabolic syndrome as a particularly important risk factor. “If you have impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose and central obesity, those are the people at highest risk. Those people need to be watched like hawks,” said George Grunberger, FACP, a member of the consensus writing panel.
The consensus also favored monitoring and treating patients’ elevated glucose levels, but the specifics are bit trickier. The ADA’s recommendations made the first headlines on this issue when they said that metformin could be considered in patients who were at very high risk of developing diabetes, which the organization defined as IFG and IGT, obesity, age under 60, plus additional risk factors.
Controversy ensued because metformin is approved by the FDA only to treat diabetes, not its precursor. “It is the first time that I know of that there is a formal recommendation for recommending a drug off-label,” said Irl B. Hirsch, FACP, chair of the ADA Professional Practice Committee.
The ACE group made cautious, but similar, suggestions that pharmacologic therapy, specifically metformin or acarbose (and even thiazolidinediones in some cases), could be used in higher risk patients, such as those with two out of three of the diagnostic criteria (IFG, IGT, metabolic syndrome) or worsening glycemia, cardiovascular disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, history of gestational diabetes or polycystic ovary syndrome.
The statement also emphasizes that prescribing decisions should be made carefully and individually, and noted that no medications are approved for prevention of diabetes. “If no drug is approved, and you give a drug to your patient and something happens, you’re liable. As an organization, it’s very hard to recommend something that has not been FDA-approved,” said Yehuda Handelsman, FACP, program chair of the ACE task force.
The group did consider changing the criteria for a diagnosis of diabetes. “If you define diabetes as a fasting glucose of 126 or more, what is 124? Is that fine?” asked Dr. Einhorn. “When the current diagnosis of diabetes was decided upon, it was based on the data they had at the time on when the benefits of treating may not have exceeded the risks of therapy. There is evidence that the cutoff point for diagnosing diabetes along the continuum of risk should be moved in favor of earlier intervention.”
Still, the group decided that the negative social ramifications of classifying more patients as diabetic (such as health insurance rejections) outweighed the potential positives, according to Dr. Handelsman. “There is not enough evidence to show that a definition change is necessary,” he said.
The lack of evidence also affects decisions about who to screen for pre- and frank diabetes.
The ACE panel found sufficient data to support screening a large segment of the population, including overweight or obese people and those of non-Caucasian ancestry. (See sidebar for full list of risk factors.) The update to ADA recommendations called for screening anyone who is overweight or obese and has an additional diabetes risk factor.
Based on an evidence review published in the June 3 Annals of Internal Medicine, however, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found little direct evidence for targeted or mass diabetes screening. The group did recommend screening asymptomatic adults with sustained blood pressure of greater than 135/80, and noted that screens could also be considered for some people with cardiovascular risk factors.
In sum, the task force found that screening was worthwhile for people who, if they were found to have diabetes, would be prescribed blood-pressure, lipid-lowering or aspirin therapy. The review also looked at the effectiveness of interventions to reduce progression of prediabetes to diabetes, and found sparse data on long-term health or economic outcomes.
“Most information comes from economic models of screening followed by appropriate treatment,” said lead author Susan L. Norris, MD. “Economic models are only as good as the data that go into them, and based on our review of the evidence, there are many gaps in the literature on the relationship between screening for diabetes and prediabetes and the health outcomes important to patients.”
The consensus statement cited some studies finding that interventions reduced diabetic complications in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or fasting glucose, but nothing that addressed the question of long-term effectiveness.
Lifestyle comes first
Another difficulty that the experts have is getting physicians and patients to comply with the preferred solution to the prediabetes epidemic—lifestyle modification. Before physicians even consider drugs, lifestyle modification should be the cornerstone of prediabetes treatment, attempted with all patients and reinforced at every visit, the ACE report urged.
“Our lifestyle is the reason we’re here,” said Etie S. Moghissi, MD, a member of the writing panel. “It’s the most effective tool we have. You cannot recommend medication for 57 million people with prediabetes.”
Dr. Einhorn agreed. “There should never be guidelines that don’t say lifestyle, lifestyle, lifestyle, then if it doesn’t work pharmacology can be added on.” The problem, he acknowledged, is that making lifestyle work can be very difficult, time-intensive and costly.
“You’d think lifestyle modification would be the least expensive [therapy]. Instead, it’s the most expensive because it’s hardest and most time-consuming to implement,” Dr. Einhorn said.
The experts had some advice on getting patients to live healthfully (see sidebar), but their report called for societal changes, too. “In medical school, there’s not a single course to teach doctors how to implement a healthy lifestyle. Education should be mandatory,” said Dr. Grunberger.
Sedentary lifestyles, busy schedules and insurance reimbursement were all cited as obstacles to lifestyle modification. “In real life, neither the patient nor the primary care physician has the time to sit down and do the things that are needed to make this a success,” said Arvind R. Cavale, FACP, an endocrinologist in Feasterville, Pa.
“The only way you can get out of this morass would be to make sure there is an incentive for patients to participate and an incentive for doctors to dispense this advice,” concluded Dr. Grunberger.
However, until incentives are realigned, endocrinologists hope that the new guidance will convince primary care physicians, the main target of the consensus statement, to identify and treat their growing population of prediabetic patients. “This should be a collective wake-up call. This is not something which can be ignored,” Dr. Grunberger said.
Who to screen for diabetes
Risk factors that merit diabetes screening include, according to the American College of Endocrinology consensus conference:
- family history of diabetes,
- cardiovascular disease,
- overweight or obese,
- sedentary lifestyle,
- non-Caucasian ancestry,
- previously identified impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, and/or metabolic syndrome,
- increased levels of triglycerides, low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or both,
- history of gestational diabetes,
- delivery of a baby weighing more than 9 pounds (4 kg),
- polycystic ovary syndrome, and
- schizophrenia and severe bipolar disease.
Finding the magic words
The American College of Endocrinology’s new consensus statement says that people with prediabetes should reduce their weight by 5%-10% and maintain it at that level. Easy to say, but how do you make it happen? Some experts in the field offer their tips:
Write a prescription for diet and exercise. Most patients already know that they should diet and exercise, but a written instruction to do so will make them take it more seriously as a doctor’s order, said George Grunberger, FACP, a member of the consensus writing panel.
Don’t assume patients know what to do. “Most docs including myself have always assumed patients know this stuff and it’s boring. It’s mindboggling how little info most patients have about their lifestyles,” Dr. Grunberger said.
Explain the basics. Tell patients exactly how many calories are in a pound, and how that can be divided into reduced calories per day and per meal.
Set appropriate and achievable goals. Simple tasks, such as walking down to the mailbox, are enough for some patients, said Doron Schneider, ACP Member, a general internist in Abington, Pa. Small diet changes can be effective too, such as switching from whole milk to skim.
Describe exercise as part of everyday life. Most patients could reasonably walk an extra block or take the stairs instead of an elevator. “It’s not so much asking them to join a gym anymore because we know that doesn’t work,” said Dr. Schneider.
Focus on calories, not special diets. “Nobody can stay on a low-carb or low-fat diet forever. It’s portion control and a meal that is nutritionally sound. It’s calories, calories, calories,” said Etie S. Moghissi, MD, a member of the writing panel.
Explain why it’s important. “I tell them, ‘We can put you on a pill but the fact is it’s much better for you if we can do this through just changing behavior. Your odds of not going on to full-blown diabetes are just as good if not better (than) with meds,’“ explained Dr. Schneider.
Repeat yourself as needed. “For some, you just need to talk one time, for others you need to set shorter goals that are easier to achieve,” said Dr. Schneider.
Find new ways to talk. Dr. Schneider, for one, has found that the techniques of motivational interviewing help him get through to patients about lifestyle modification.
Get outside help. “Refer to diabetes teams. Now we have a diagnostic category of prediabetes and you can have a dietitian or exercise physiologist give the next level of professional advice,” said Daniel Einhorn, MD, another member of the writing panel.
Internist Archives Quick Links
What will you learn from your Annals Virtual Patient?
Annals Virtual Patients is a unique patient care simulator that mirrors real patient care decisions and consequences. CME Credit and MOC Points are available. Start off with a FREE sample case. Start your journey now.
Products and Resources for Patients
ACP has developed easy- to-use materials designed to help educate your patients on self-management of a wide variety of common health conditions. Order yours today!